Skip navigation

Category Archives: News Stories


Apparently Pakistan, in the interest of “peace” has decided to abandon the people of the Swat Valley to the hands of the Taliban. While they are hoping this will bring peace, they are making this deal at the expense of defenseless citizens. Women, children, and those who oppose this way of life now have no hope and no way out.

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — The government agreed to impose Islamic law and suspend a military offensive across a large swath of northwest Pakistan on Monday in concessions aimed at pacifying a spreading Taliban insurgency there.

The announcement came after talks with local Islamists, including one closely linked to the Taliban.

The move will likely concern the United States, which has warned Pakistan that such peace agreements allow Al Qaeda and Taliban militants operating near the Afghan border time to rearm and regroup.

Amir Haider Khan Hoti, the chief minister for the North West Frontier Province, said authorities would impose Islamic law in Malakand region, which includes the Swat Valley. Swat is a one-time tourist haven in the northwest where extremists have gained sway through brutal tactics including beheading residents, burning girls schools and attacking security forces.

He said the laws would only be implemented when the valley was peaceful.

Read the full article at

This is another of the great concessions that are being made to appease radical Islam (if there is such a thing). The struggle for this valley has been going on for some time and perhaps the Pakistani government thinks that this will be the end of it. Hand over thousands of citizens to the mercy of the Taliban of the Swat Valley, notorious for beheading those accused of espionage and even going so far as to dig up dead bodies and hang them, and perhaps there will be peace. The Pakistani government seems to believe that the goal of the Taliban in their country is NOT to control the entire country. Tell that to Benazir Bhutto


The new president of the United States has chosen the “high road” by starting the shutdown of Guantanamo Bay thus signaling to the world, there are few consequences for attacking our citizens, withholding information that could save lives or collaborating with the enemy. Our Cultural Relativist in Chief has decided that if we treat them right, perhaps they will treat us right. Maybe President Obama should listen to what our enemies are telling us:


Peshawar, Jan 31 : Tehrik-e-Taliban Swat chief Maulana Fazlullah has said Islam recommends slitting the throat of a man if he is charged with espionage, adding that this is also the Sunnat of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and his companions acted upon this.

Fazlullah was replying to allegations that the Taliban slits throats of people and even digs up dead bodies of men from graves and then hangs them.

Fazlullah is only one of the many Islamists calling for the mistreatment or even gruesome murder of their enemies (namely us). Many of those voices are much louder than Fazlullah and the implementation of these ideas have been going on since Islam began. Islam apparently takes no prisoners, unless they may be useful as slaves or willing to convert to Islam. If a U.S. soldier comes upon an unarmed suspect, he has a pretty good chance of being captured, put in jail with air conditioning, three meals a day, a Qu’ran, given the ability to pray whenever he wants to, and receive a lawyer – all at the U.S. taxpayer’s expense. However, if a U.S. soldier or agent is captured, he is murdered, beheaded, mutilated, or worse. Perhaps the U.N. should look into berating the Taliban instead of arguing that one of our soldiers threw a Qu’ran in the toilet. They certainly didn’t say anything when a crucifix submerged in urine was funded by taxpayer dollars and upheld as artwork.

I am not sure if even President Obama knows what his plan is. So far, to the Muslim world he has said, “We’ll play nice and if you decide not to, we will give you a very violent slap on the wrist!”

Maulana Fazlullah is known as one of Pakistan’s most wanted terrorists. In 2007, he established a parallel government in 59 villages of Pakistan’s Swat valley with the help of over 4,000 militants. Ultimately the region was conceded to Fazlullah and his Taliban forces in exchange for peace in the region. This treaty was broken by Fazlullah not long after.

Today, Pakistan has sent over 20,000 troops to the Swat Valley in order to restore order. The parallel Shari’a government setup by Fazlullah seems still alive and well with many people afraid to continue their regular jobs, receiving little protection from the Pakistani government. The decapitated body of a police officer hanging in the streets reminds people of the real law in the Swat Valley. 54 have been killed so far. Pakistan is going to have to press harder and keep up the fight against the Taliban in their country. It is one area where the fight against the people has been bitter and effective.


It appears the Obama administration is already causing a blackout of information. On the sliding scale of “justice” I would say a media black out on bio-terror would have to be criminal.

The U.S. media has been stabbing the people in the back for some time now and it seems ultimately they would like us to be a bunch of sitting ducks. I am considerably more interested in proof that terrorists are working on biological weapons than the latest Oscar fashion faux pax. While their coverage of the incoming Obama administration has been an obamination, it would have been difficult to fathom that they were seeking the actual demise of our nation, completely. After all, if we are all dead, who is going to sit around all day doing what they tell us to do?

Oliver Guitta of the Middle East Times reports on an Al-Qaida training camp in Tizi Ouzou (Algeria) that has been fiddling with, of all things, the Plague:

In the middle of the massive coverage of U.S. President Barack Obama’s inauguration, a rather troublesome news story emerged. Unfortunately, it failed to get the coverage it deserves. If confirmed, it deserves the full attention of the Obama administration: the story has to do with bio-terrorism.

The story began with a Jan. 6 report in the Algerian newspaper Echorouk that a number of terrorists had died of the plague in one of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) training camps in Tizi Ouzou. Another Algerian newspaper En-Nahar, affirmed that 50 terrorists have been diagnosed with the plague, 40 of whom have already died.

Read the full article here.

While this bunch of backyard geneticists has literally been killing themselves to find an ironic way to strike western civilization, we have been having the Obama pulled over our eyes. “That’s right folks, don’t watch what my left hand is doing!” the media seems to say.

While BHO is on his middle east tour, we can definitely assume that he, and the media will be putting a messianic twist on every word he says, though his approval ratings dropped about 15 points upon his entrance to office. (Apparently, just being the president is unfavorable. We can add another 15 points to GWB’s exit ratings to level it out a bit). My fear is not that these ideas will be beyond President Obama and the U.S. media, but rather, in the interest of salvaging their true world view, they will ignore all of the facts until one day, our new president will be sitting there enjoying a story at one of our overfunded and underperforming, public schools when suddenly his eyes give us that terrified stare. The message will come, Mr. President, the U.S. is under attack. But by then, Mr. President, it will already be too late.

Lord Nazir Amhed

From the desk of Thomas Landen on Mon, 2009-01-26 11:16

The House of Lords is a venerable British institution, but what does one get if one accepts Muslims in? This:

A member of the Lords intended to invite her colleagues to a private meeting in a conference room in the House of Lords to meet the Dutch politician Geert Wilders, an elected member of the Dutch parliament, to watch his controversial movie Fitna and discuss the movie and Mr. Wilders’ opinions with him.

Barely had the invitation been sent to all the members of the House when Lord Ahmed raised hell. He threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organizing the event to court. The result is that the event, which should have taken place next Thursday was cancelled.

Lord Ahmed immediately went to the Pakistani press to boast about his achievement, which he calls “a victory for the Muslim community.”

A victory for the Muslim community, but a defeat for British democracy where topics to which Muslims object cannot even be debated. That, apparently, is what one gets when one accepts Muslims into the House of Lords.

Lord Ahmed is considered to be a “moderate” Muslim. The Pakistani born Nazir Ahmed became the United Kingdom’s first Muslim life peer in 1998. He is a member of the Labour Party and was appointed to the Lords by Tony Blair. Lord Ahmed took his oath on the Koran. He led one of the first delegations on behalf of the British Government on the Muslim pilgrimage of the Hajj, to Saudi Arabia. In February 2005, Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. In 2007, he responded to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by stating that he was appalled, saying that Rushdie had “blood on his hands.”

Lord Ahmed was among the founders of The World Forum, an organization set up “to promote world peace in the aftermath of 9/11 with an effort to build bridges of understanding between The Muslim World and the West by reviving a tradition of Dialogue between people, cultures and civilizations based on tolerance.”

What does “dialogue” mean to those who make discussion about controversial issues impossible? Thank you, Mr. Blair, for bringing “diversity” to the House of Lords.

Original post at The Brussels Journal

I say, the only way to turn this issue on it’s head, is for the west to become a bigger threat than Islam. We need to start threatening riots, and then actually do it. These politicians will be in a conundrum, but perhaps they will make the right choice for once.

2009: A year to defend free speech
Or lose it.

By Geert Wilders & Robert Spencer

Wednesday, January 21, was a black day for freedom, and the beginning of an all-out assault on free speech in the Netherlands. The Amsterdam Court of Appeals ordered the prosecution of Geert Wilders (one of this article’s co-authors) for his statements about Islam. To participate in public debate is now a dangerous activity. This is the Netherlands today—and it could be the entire Western world tomorrow.

Click here to read Read More »


I posted a message earlier about Khalid Yasin, the radical Muslim preacher who has used derogatory terms to describe gays and lesbians as well as his constant hateful preaching about western culture and people. In light of Geert Wilders being prosecuted for hate speech, I think it is fair to say that men like Yasin should be further barred from entering the country. After all, it’s only fair.


Yasin is not the only man who needs to be silenced. Dutch Imam, Amhed Salam has been credited with such offenses as, refusing to shake the hand of the Dutch Immigration Minister because she was a woman and telling all Muslims in Holland that they must not pay taxes in order to harm the Dutch state. But, apparently, these crimes are much less offensive than what Geert Wilders has done by warning his countrymen about the dangers of Islamisation. While Geert will be standing trial, it is almost guaranteed that these men will be walking free and continuing their true hate speech.

Click here to read Read More »